Season Overview

The 2025/2026 League One season was a rollercoaster for BetSignals subscribers, with a total of 557 fixtures analysed, yielding 452 fixtures with valid model signals. The overall signal hit rate stood at 58.3%, indicating a generally reliable predictive performance by our models.

Signal Performance

The breakdown of signal performance by location and star rating reveals some interesting trends. Home signals were the most accurate, with ★★★ signals achieving a 66.7% hit rate, followed by ★★ at 67.2% and ★ at 49.3%. Draw signals had a notably lower hit rate of 33.3%. Away signals performed less consistently, with ★★★ signals at 60.0%, ★★ at 49.3%, and ★ at 33.9%. Overall, home signals outperformed away signals, with ★★★ signals providing the highest accuracy across both home and away matches.

Match Winner P&L

In our approach to match winner betting, we evaluated two strategies: backing every signal and backing only value bets (edge > 0).

Backing Every Signal

Value Bets Only (Edge > 0)

Filtering to value bets added meaningful edge, as evidenced by the higher ROI of 24.74% compared to 15.92% for all signals. This suggests that selective betting based on edge can be a profitable strategy.

BTTS by Probability Bracket

| Bracket | Fixtures | Hit% | Back All Bets | Back All P&L | Back All ROI | Value Bets | Value P&L | Value ROI |

|---------|----------|------|---------------|--------------|--------------|------------|-----------|-----------|

| <45% | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | -4.00 | -100.0% | 0 | - | - |

| 45-50% | 40 | 52.5%| 40 | +0.05 | 0.1% | 7 | -2.52 | -36.0% |

| 50-55% | 93 | 51.6%| 93 | -5.25 | -5.6% | 32 | +0.22 | 0.7% |

| 55-60% | 108 | 57.4%| 108 | +0.64 | 0.6% | 63 | -5.63 | -8.9% |

| 60-65% | 56 | 51.8%| 56 | -7.96 | -14.2% | 35 | -10.15 | -29.0% |

| 65-70% | 12 | 66.7%| 12 | +1.32 | 11.0% | 12 | +1.32 | 11.0% |

| 70%+ | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | -1.00 | -100.0% | 1 | -1.00 | -100.0% |

| Total| 314 | 52.2%| 314 | -16.20 | -5.2% | 150 | -17.76 | -11.8% |

The actual BTTS rate was 52.2%, slightly below the V12 model average of 55.9%.

Over 2.5 by Probability Bracket

| Bracket | Fixtures | Hit% | Back All Bets | Back All P&L | Back All ROI | Value Bets | Value P&L | Value ROI |

|---------|----------|------|---------------|--------------|--------------|------------|-----------|-----------|

| <45% | 35 | 37.1%| 35 | -8.57 | -24.5% | 4 | -1.50 | -37.5% |

| 45-50% | 56 | 51.8%| 56 | +0.55 | 1.0% | 16 | -0.37 | -2.3% |

| 50-55% | 102 | 52.9%| 102 | +3.31 | 3.2% | 52 | +4.35 | 8.4% |

| 55-60% | 75 | 57.3%| 75 | +3.11 | 4.1% | 48 | +1.89 | 3.9% |

| 60-65% | 32 | 56.3%| 32 | -1.54 | -4.8% | 20 | -1.79 | -8.9% |

| 65-70% | 12 | 58.3%| 12 | +0.53 | 4.4% | 12 | +0.53 | 4.4% |

| 70%+ | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | -2.00 | -100.0% | 2 | -2.00 | -100.0% |

| Total| 314 | 50.6%| 314 | -4.61 | -1.5% | 154 | +1.11 | 0.7% |

The actual Over 2.5 rate was 50.6%, below the V12 model average of 53.4%.

Team Analysis

Several teams over-performed relative to their expected goals (xG):

Over-performers

Conversely, some teams under-performed:

Under-performers

Lincoln had the highest signal hit rate at 71.4%, while Port Vale had the lowest at 66.7%.

Players to Follow

Several players stood out for their goal-scoring and assist contributions:

Top Scorers

Top Assisters

Players to Watch

Key Takeaways